Today the Supreme Court announced its decision on the constitutionality of the Affordable Care Act, or health care reform, in a case officially entitled National Federation of Independent Businesses et al. v. Sebelius, Secretary of Health and Human Services, et al. As was discussed in a previous NCSD Weekly Update, the court took up four separate issues regarding the law:
In a 5-4 decision with Chief Justice John Roberts writing the majority opinion, the Supreme Court upheld the Affordable Care Act, including the individual mandate, as constitutional. Specifically, the Court read the mandate that most Americans have health care coverage as a tax, deeming the individual mandate as constitutional due to Congress’ taxing power.
The Court also upheld the expansion of the Medicaid program as constitutional, but limited Congress’ ability to withhold all federal Medicaid funds from states that do not comply with the new eligibility requirements. On that question, the Court held that the Medicaid expansion was constitutional as long as states would only lose new funds if they did not comply with the new requirements, rather than all of their federal Medicaid funding. Said another way, the Court found that states could choose to not expand its Medicaid program to 133% of FPL (as currently required in the law) and still keep their existing Medicaid funds, only losing out on the federal funds to expand Medicaid coverage.
Additional analysis from NCSD on the ruling will be coming as staff continues to wade through all the judicial arguments. Please stay tuned for additional updates as part of the NCSD Weekly Update.
As always, if you have questions or concerns, please contact Stephanie Arnold Pang, NCSD’s Manager, Policy and Communications at email@example.com or 202-715-3865.